Non-motorized

Non-motorized travel refers to infrastructure and technologies that support walking, biking, and micromobility—such as shared transportation/mobility options, bicycle signal phasing, leading pedestrian intervals (LPI), and buffered bike/micromobility lanes—to improve safety and accessibility for all users.


shared transportation/mobility

Shared mobility includes bikes, cars, and scooters available for short-term rental, usually through stations spread throughout an area.

Costs

  • Bike share systems: $15,000 to $100,000, depending on the number of bikes and stations

  • Scooter share systems: $20,000 to $80,000

  • Car share services: $10,000 to over $100,000

Key Considerations

  • Availability of space for stations

  • Population density and demand

  • Access to power for charging vehicles

Pros

  • Last-mile solution to transit

  • Reductions in greenhouse gases

  • Reductions in vehicle use or ownership

Cons

  • May not be returned to a hub

  • Start-up and maintenance costs

  • Vandalism

Representative Use Cases

Santa Monica

Baton Rouge

Field Conditions

Best suited for dense downtown areas, central business districts (CBDs), or mobility hubs where there is high demand for shared transportation options.


bicycle signal phasing

Designated traffic signals at intersections that indicate when cyclists have the right of way to cross safely.

Costs

Ranges from $1,000 to $100,000 per intersection, depending on the number of signal heads, system complexity, and type of bike detection technology used.

Key Considerations

  • Type of bike infrastructure present

  • Presence of other roadway users (vehicles, pedestrians)

  • Priority given to different users at the intersection

Pros

  • Enhances safety for cyclists

  • Designates specific time for different intersection/roadway users

Cons

  • Reduces time for cars at the intersection

  • Increases complexity of the signal

Representative Use Cases

Nashville, TN

Field Conditions

Ideal for intersections and areas with existing bike facilities, especially in denser locations where multiple transportation modes converge and signalized intersections are present.


leading pedestrian interval

Traffic signals adjusted to give pedestrians a head start by allowing them to enter the crosswalk before vehicles get a green light.

Costs

Typically ranges from $200 to $1,200 per intersection, depending on the existing infrastructure.

Key Considerations

  • Availability and type of pedestrian infrastructure

  • Presence of other roadway users

  • Priority assigned to different users at the intersection

Pros

  • Enhances safety for pedestrians

  • Allows pedestrians to establish presence in the crosswalk before vehicles can go

Cons

  • Minor vehicular delays

  • Increases complexity of the signal

Representative Use Cases

New York City

Field Conditions

Best suited for signalized intersections that include pedestrian facilities such as crosswalks, curb ramps, and sidewalks.


buffered bike/micromobility lanes

Dedicated lanes for bikes and micromobility devices that include a physical or painted buffer to separate cyclists from vehicle traffic or parked cars.

Costs

Typically ranges from $40,000 to $118,000 per mile, depending on design features and materials used.

Key Considerations

  • May require cyclists to merge with traffic at intersections

  • Sufficient roadway space is necessary for bike and buffer lanes

  • Safety considerations for all users

  • Appropriate widths for both bike lanes and buffers

  • Placement and impact of nearby parking spaces

Pros

  • Enhances safety

  • Comfortable cycling

Cons

  • Requires more of the roadway or increased ROW needs

  • Community resistance to change

Representative Use Cases

Seattle, WA

Field Conditions

Best suited for medium- to high-density areas where there is available or adaptable right-of-way (ROW) to accommodate the bike and buffer lanes.

 
Next (Operations)